00:00
00:00
Quarl

850 Audio Reviews w/ Response

All 1,312 Reviews

Berklee you say?

Berklee huh? Thinking of going there? I have a friend over there that just finished his freshmen year. Great place, great people.

Since getting out of a recent car accident I'm noticing that I listen to music differently. Everything is becoming a little less subjective. That makes leaving an adequate review kind of difficult... dunno.... I feel like the dynamics could have been greater. The "expert" at Berklee might have missed that. I've worked with live violins once so I know how hard it can be to manipulate those strings once they're down but greater dynamics could have been done with a little bit of creative mixing. They could even have thrown in a trill or two. Everything sounds like it comes in at around the same amplification. Maybe some of those drums could have been brought forward. A little... dunno. I'm a hypocrite for pointing out any of this because when it comes down to the final product I get too lazy to do any of this. Besides, it wasn't really your call to make. Aw well :P

It's good, I just feel like it could be a bit better. Regardless, I can't necessarily hold any of that against you. It seems like most of my criticisms weren't your fault... you get a ten for composing in 5/4 ^_^

KgZ responds:

Thank you very much for the feedback, I really wish I could have done more with it. I actually only had 30 minutes to use live recording and 30 minutes to mix it, so I was really limited.

To be honest, I didn't plan on this being 5/4. I kept getting frustrated when I was singing the melody why it didn't fit in 4/4. I felt so stupid afterward, haha.

mraw

When the track started up I thought you were going in this direction: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQp7Id 8iRA4

Yeah! Alright! Cool!

Great bass making technique. I've heard that one before though. It's really funny to hear the different stories of how people have made effective reeces. I remember in the lifted forums, someone made a really sick reece from recording raspberries being blown on his girlfriend. Nav told me how he took a bass kick once and played it next to itself a few hundred times in the sequencer to get a reece sound. Good times, good times. Nothing I can leave review wise to be constructive. Just keep doing what you do :3

Rig responds:

I love that video. I so should've done something like that.
THANKS QUARL :3

rawr

Hmm, it's good... but I know/love the original too much. My personal philosophy is that nothing beats the original and it's damn tough to challenge Geier. I'm not sure if I want to leave an in depth review for this because you seem to know a lot all ready. Also, one problem I run into all the time with remixes is that it's really tough to get that original sound in there while balancing it out with your own creativity, so I know how hard it can be, but this is missing so much... more modulation/ less volume on the reece might help. Maybe even just less volume on the reece. Who knows, try taking off more of the high end on that reece. Play with that reece more. I think that's half of what I don't agree with. In fact... that might be all I don't agree with. I guess I should apologize and congratulate you on such a good song then immediately tell you to work more on that reece. Sorry :P

Dunno if you've heard Misha's Remix of Solar, but check that on youtube if not. Good stuff ^_^

boney-man responds:

yeah i've heard it... i like the original better :D

and i know about the reese, now that i hear this song again, that reese needs a lot of work... maybe i'll fix it and re-upload.

thanks man

aha. not bad but...

I half agree with slip streamer but he's being way too dick about it with out being helpful at all. First off, the amen break is great for learning how to slice a beat and rearrange it, but the amen break got old back in 95. People who are just getting into dnb love it because it's pretty obvious that it's a good sound, but I kid you not when I say everyone has had their dick up in that break. Seriously, using the amen break will get you aids... well... it won't, but I'm just trying to make an analogy here that we can laugh at and maybe learn something from. What I'm trying to say is that it's just been really overdone.

A better technique for drum programming is to layer different sounds to make new drum kits. In order to get a really good snare, layer around four other snares on top of each other. As you get better at this, you'll understand what makes a good snare. Typically try to get sounds that hit different areas of the sound spectrum. Start with a really typical jazz/funk snare for the mid frequencies, then get a really low sound (sometimes I use a bass kick and hide it in there.) Then get a really high sound like a 909 snare (sometimes I use cymbals instead but that takes a little modulation). Then I'll throw on an additional snare for character. Then use a compressor/ equalizer to cut/boost specific frequencies. You can do all this to your kicks as well.

Now for your description of paragons track as "breakbeat" and this as "drum and bass." Well that's sort of right, but paragons song was within the average bpm of a dnb song and was in fact dnb, specifically trance step. Now if I really wanted to be a dick I could say that this track isn't really dnb. It's breakcore. But all this is genre admiring is worthless shit. Adhering to genres will only help you improve at making said genre. When it comes right down to it, music is music and genres only muddy things up and get people to argue over and over again about meaningless shit. Take indy for example. Indy isn't really anything new. It's just rock music. Plain and simple. The term indy came from the idea that a band was independent from a label and therefor had to pay their own fucking bills. For some reason though people misunderstood that idea and started calling all music that sounded like rock "indy." Then "indy labels" started poping up. A complete fucking paradox. You see what I'm getting at? I'm pissed at how indy has come to be and it really doesn't matter at all. Fuck genres.

Ok, back to the review. Not a bad reese you have going. It's sounding really simple though. Modulate that beast. Pitch bend, automate the frequencies to cut over time, layer it with another less typical sounding reese. Make it shine. Experiment. What you have here is classic, but there's so much more that can be said and done.

A few little things that got to me: your voice at the beginning of the track. I can read thank you. I knew what I was listening to before the track even loaded up. It just sounds silly. Get rid of it. I listened to a few of your other tracks too... stop announcing your songs. The only reason I can think of why some one would do that is to protect their stuff from getting stolen, but I really don't think your good enough for that to happen to and for it to even matter if it did. Those crowd cheering samples were also really silly. Those belong in trance genres and they always sound really cheesy. Drop em.

Now, I know this may have seemed like a hard review, but I'm only leaving this because I feel like you have a lot of potential. There so much to learn, you just have to be active in your quest for knowledge. I'm sure you do this, but you have to try something new in every song you make. Keep learning sir and I'm sure you'll be able to cock slap slip streamer next time he stops in on one of your tracks.

Peace sir.

YouriX responds:

Aah! Now this is a review! I can learn from! Anyways! I didnt know i made Breakcore! That sounds pretty cool!

But back to the review as i read thru your comment you really put some attention to my Drum sampeling. Well I guess i should go back to the books as one would say, and do some seriues drum layering. But since i am kinda of a newbie to the DnB world i like hearing the Amen drums. But your right if i keep using it i might get aids :( *aids of unoriginalty!*

But uuuh i like anoucing my songs it sounds cool :P
Also the cheering effect i hardly never use it and i thaught it would be cool to add it.

But i am glad you took i mean really took your time to review and not be a dick about it and also since i kinda know you because like me your a Audio forum Elite a older one wich makes you more elite then me :P
I respect your opinion and will try to improve. I do want to be original so making my own drumloops would help me achieve that!

rawr :3

aha, le sound art/electroacoustics/ sonic/ whatever you want to call it. I felt like I owed you for your kind words so I went and listened to all your stuff. I chose to hit up this one with a review though because I'm an art major and this kind of work tickles me more than the over saturated over produced typical dance tracks we've all grown to love and create. This kind of work is more honest to me. It's experimental. It hits a vibe that you really can't scratch with a melody.

I really like whats going on here, but I agree with rig. I'd like to hear some more out of the sound spectrum. OVerall it has a bit too much of that hi fuzz. It's good for a bit but like rig and I are saying, a bit more variety with those sounds. While the entire track was generally a bit of an experiment, perhaps you should consider going back and adding things intentionaly. A sub bass might be a nice little addition. I notice some infrasonic sounds, but some more would be pleasant.

Overall, great! Keep playing around. Keep sonic art alive!

Mich responds:

Thanks for the nice review and the tips here!
I'll keep those tips in the back of my head if I go for something like this again :)
This time I just used the standard 4 samplers in FL, so yeah
I'll add more variety with different samples, and perhaps add some synths too next time.

Thanks for reviewing! :)

meow

Sure is a lot of zero voting going on lately. Good thing we have millions of fans and are untouchable gods on this tiny website called newgrounds. Peons will bow before our might and hand over 10 fives for every zero. Yes sir. Gods.

Since you can't be arsed into making a full dnb track I won't feel arsish to leave a blatantly non-helpful review. Besides, you know more than me. I just look prettier.

Nav responds:

lol

rawr

Great song. Just one thing that can use some work. The dynamics. Lets hear those drums change up their velocities every once in a while. It makes the drums sound more organic and live. A nice little technique I use is to slap on some delay with the hi hats, then accent every other note. The delay if kept in sync with the tempo of the track will create instant dynamics. Another good technique is to always make sure the kick on 1 is always stronger. Live drummers have a tendency to accent the first kick. Drums arn't the only sounds that can benefit from deeper dynamics, but those semi arp synths could have used some velocity change ups.

Other than the dynamics this is a really great mix. Interesting panning on the lead synth.

winKoneR responds:

Thanks for listening, reviewing and valuable advices ! I love dnb, but in making it, I suck :) This is maybe first better one ;) Thanks one more time !

meow

WEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, here goes.

I might recommend dropping that synth lead towards the beginning in favor of a slightly more complex piano line. Or you should try adding some more reverb to it/ cutting the high frequencies... just an idea though. Cool drums... hi hat rhythm can use some 16th notes to add a little flavor/zing. Melodies are working pretty good. Have you figured out how to automate synth modulations? Cause the synth that comes in around 1:42 would sound hot with some filtering or some sort of slight changes in it's characteristics over time. Wait... there it is. It just came in too little too late for me. There's that piano. Sitting in the back. Not where I'd put it, but it has a cool thang going.

When the aux percussion comes in later: shakers would sound better if the syncopation was different... actually, here's a really fun technique to play with... try slapping your hi hats/ shakers with some delay. You'll notice that writing interesting rhythms gets a hell of a lot easier because the delay will create automatic dynamics. Just accent every other note and don't be afraid to throw in a few off beat hits.

I could be more helpful but I'm really fucking tired right now. Long day. Sleep needed. all in all great tune. Not what I'm used to hearing, a lot of things caught me off guard. While the review seemed pretty objective, keep in mind that I'll probably like it more tomorrow when I'm not drunk on tired. Peace sir.

S3C responds:

oooh happy happy joy joy what a pleasant review. thanks!

i'm rather inclined to agree with most of your criticisms:

-i might trash the synth at the intro in favor of a more developed piano, as it does add much anyway, right?
-I agree, the drums could use a tad more flavorizing (mmmm)
-Automating the synth sounds like great idea! I just got caught with working the other instruments and departments that I forgot to fiddle around with the main lead line...hmmm
-My intention for the piano was to just be a color to play simple motifs in the background, nothing more really :)
-Good tip about the shaker rhythms. I actually used that delay technique on the main drum kit once the portamento lead comes in, if you can hear.

Wasted or not, this was still quite a helpful review that I'm appreciative of. Thanks Quarl! And I have been keeping up with your work- I shall review it tomorrow or the day after when I am drunk or tired. Peace sir!

fap

Curious, why rewire to cubase when reason is fully capable of awesome sauce on it's own? In any case, I think I'll take this time to give you an insightful/helpful review. If I wanted to be nice I'd say GREAT JORB but I kind of feel like beating up on you today.

Drums can be stronger. Not sure if you enjoy them sounding like the way you have them, but try this: Make an instance of the redrum, initialize it. Make two spider audio mergers and two instances of the mastering suite combi. Now run three wires into a merger and four into the second. Then run each through their own mastering suite. The splitter with three wires will be dedicated to kicks and the one with four will be dedicated to snares. Viola. Amazing layering complete with advanced control over the characteristics of the drums. Now create a mixer solely for the drums. Channel one and two should be your kick/snare. Now make another redrum/ initialize it. Send it into the drum mixer. Once this is done start setting up the aux sends with effects.

Try playing with delay. I like to put a little delay on the hi hats/ shakers. This makes it really easy to get nice dynamics with out even trying. All you have to do is accent every other note. If you can't get a decent drum sound through layering, try setting up an aux with distortion and hit up that snare a tad. I like to leave room in the aux sends for some reverb, but it's up to you. Typically, I'll only use reverb on the hi hats if the track needs a little more space filled out. Or I'll automate the drums to have heavy reverb at specific times. A bass kick with heavy reverb really sounds nice when used at the right time. A great time for it in this track would have been around 4:45 when the kick is holding the tempo. Just saying, would have been nice.

Now lets work on that reese. I find that the malstrom is great for getting a really hard reese sound. Initialize, set two sawtooths *16. Get the ocilators running through the filters and get the frequencies all the way up. Throw on some scream distortion. Go the mixer and up the treble a tad. You should now have something that resembles a really strong reese. Play with the parameters until you have perfection.

Now I'm not sure how much automation you use, but I find that it's really useful to run automation on everything you can. I find that my malstrom synths typically average around 10 lanes of automation. You really can't go wrong with it sir. Unless of course your using reason 3 in which case I implore you to upgrade. I got the chance to play with reason 3 a while back and all I have to say is that reason 4 makes automation a hell of a lot more fun. Hmmm... I guess that wasn't too helpful if your still on 3. Sorry.

Now, I felt as if this track really lacked a climax. Maybe if you upped the octave of the pad that comes in at around 3:20 and threw on some distortion, you might have a neat little lead. Up the reverb even. Dunno. There's always room to play. If you ever feel as if you like something too much to experiment with it and your too pussy to see how far you can push the undo button, just make a new synth and move the note lane over. No one's looking. Don't feel bashful. Try it.

All things said, it's a great song. If I was wrong about you using reason 3, then I say we collab sometime in reason 4. Who knows. Maybe we could make something beautiful. Peace.

Rucklo responds:

great in depth review right here man, thanks alot for it! loved the remix you made, btw. gonna have to review it! :)

meow.

haha, fuck yeah. I love experimental work like this. It reminds me of everything we listen to in my time media class. Since it's more of an abstract piece there's not a lot I could say in terms of what you could do better. Just keep doing it. Whatever it is you do. Do it with all your heart and soul.

Erkie responds:

aye capn

When everyone screams about AI ruining music just remember, I ruined it first.

Cory F. Jaeger @Quarl

Age 35, ♀ she/her

Synth

Alfred University

Groundhog Lake, Colorado

Joined on 5/30/05

Level:
31
Exp Points:
10,468 / 10,670
Exp Rank:
3,100
Vote Power:
7.27 votes
Audio Scouts
10+
Art Scouts
1
Rank:
Private
Global Rank:
3,577
Blams:
787
Saves:
1,724
B/P Bonus:
18%
Whistle:
Normal
Trophies:
12
Medals:
748
Supporter:
3y 2m 22d
Gear:
2