Quarl AIM 2022 Review
Composition/Structure (0-10), Production (0-10), Emotion (0-10), Relevance to Artwork (0-10)
TenodiBoris, Mystery : 8,7,4,1 (20/40)
I took a look at the art before listening to the music and said "oh shit." We're really left to interpret how the art relates to the music and that has the potential to lead to a little disappointment. You took a huge risk by using an abstract, psychedelic, arguably meaningless visual. I'm not getting a lot of structure from the art so when I heard the drum kit I kind of sighed and said "damn." I'm an old drummer and though I love some driving percussion it just didn't fit in with the art you chose. I can acknowledge the work you put into the track, you have some very strong ideas but you should pick a visual next time that really conveys a time, place, feeling, or setting. This track won't manage to stand out from other tracks in the competition and I'm at risk of forgetting about it when compared to some of the other presentations. I feel like you really challenged yourself in some respects such as structure and length, but given how important the art is for this competition you shot yourself in the foot a little.
I want to apologize because so far, this is the harshest review I've written. I mean no harm by it, sometimes we need to hear a little constructive criticism to help guide our creative aspirations. Hopefully I'll hear more from you in the future, I love getting to know the community better. You're a part of our community so never be afraid to share a little bit about yourself and your intentions. It can really help a judge better understand the work if you mention what makes you tick, what you were aiming for, or how you felt personally. You have the space to write a manifesto. Good luck with the other judges, regardless of my review this was a pleasurable track to listen to, if a little strange. Have a wonderful day Tenodi!